Skip to article
Astra

Critical Care

Shock Hemodynamic Assessment

Assess shock by confirming impaired perfusion, rapidly defining the dominant hemodynamic phenotype with bedside ultrasound and dynamic testing, then escalating to invasive monitoring when initial resuscitation fails or mixed cardiopulmonary physiology makes further fluid, vasopressor, or inotrope decisions uncertain.

Clinical question: How should clinicians phenotype shock hemodynamics and select monitoring that changes immediate resuscitation decisions?

First minutes

Confirm circulatory shock and establish a monitoring baseline

Treat hypoperfusion while determining whether low output, vasodilation, volume loss, obstruction, or a mixed state predominates.

Establish that the patient has circulatory shock by documenting impaired tissue perfusion rather than relying on blood pressure alone. Hypotension is commonly expressed as systolic pressure below 90 mm Hg or mean arterial pressure below 65 mm Hg, but shock may present before sustained hypotension. Track serial lactate, bedside evidence of hypoperfusion, and organ dysfunction because ongoing shock is characterized by elevated lactate, clinical hypoperfusion, and end-organ damage. AHA JournalsMixed Shock Complicating Cardiogenic ShockWolters KluwerShock: Pathophysiology, Classification, and the... : Cardiology in ReviewPubMedShock - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf

Place an invasive arterial catheter early when shock is present and obtain focused cardiac ultrasound as part of the initial hemodynamic assessment. In suspected cardiogenic shock, contemporary criteria emphasize evidence of low cardiac output and appropriate ventricular filling pressure in addition to tissue hypoperfusion; hypotension alone is an inadequate surrogate for pump failure. Wolters KluwerWhat is cardiogenic shock? New clinical criteria urgently... : Current Opinion in Critical CareScienceDirectUse and Implications of Echocardiography in the Hemodynamic Assessment of Cardiogenic Shock - ScienceDirect

Use the first assessment to determine whether the dominant phenotype is distributive, hypovolemic, cardiogenic, obstructive, or mixed. This classification is a treatment decision: volume depletion and preload responsiveness favor a limited fluid strategy; vasodilatory physiology may require vasopressor support; ventricular pump failure, acute valvular or septal pathology, pericardial constraint, or pulmonary vascular obstruction require mechanism-specific intervention rather than empiric repeated fluid boluses. AHA JournalsMixed Shock Complicating Cardiogenic ShockScienceDirectUse and Implications of Echocardiography in the Hemodynamic Assessment of Cardiogenic Shock - ScienceDirectPubMedShock - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf

Initial bedside hemodynamic branches and the next discriminating assessment. ScienceDirectUse and Implications of Echocardiography in the Hemodynamic Assessment of Cardiogenic Shock - ScienceDirectPubMedFALLS-protocol: lung ultrasound in hemodynamic assessment of shock - PMCPubMedShock - StatPearls - NCBI BookshelfccjmConsensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task ...
Dominant bedside patternImmediate discriminating testInterpretation that changes next action
Depressed ventricular pump function or suspected acute cardiac structural complicationFocused transthoracic echocardiography with cardiac output, filling-pressure, right-heart, pulmonary-hemodynamic, and congestion assessmentTreat as cardiogenic physiology; define LV versus RV involvement and look for acute coronary syndrome mechanical complications before giving further empiric fluid. ScienceDirectUse and Implications of Echocardiography in the Hemodynamic Assessment of Cardiogenic Shock - ScienceDirect
Suspected pulmonary embolic or other obstructive physiologyFocused echocardiography for right-heart findings; McConnell sign can support obstructive shock due to pulmonary embolismPrioritize confirmation and relief of obstruction rather than escalating fluids solely for hypotension. ScienceDirectUse and Implications of Echocardiography in the Hemodynamic Assessment of Cardiogenic Shock - ScienceDirect
A-profile on lung ultrasound after obstructive and left-sided cardiogenic shock are excludedFluid-limited assessment with serial clinical response and lung ultrasoundAn A-profile is associated with pulmonary artery occlusion pressure at or below 18 mm Hg; improvement with fluid supports hypovolemia, whereas B-profile conversion without improvement supports distributive/septic physiology in the FALLS framework. PubMedFALLS-protocol: lung ultrasound in hemodynamic assessment of shock - PMC
Persistent hypoperfusion with discordant or mixed bedside findingsAdvanced hemodynamic monitoring with pulmonary artery catheterization or transpulmonary thermodilutionUse measured output and cardiopulmonary variables to decide whether further fluid, vasopressor, inotrope, or mechanical support is physiologically justified. PubMedHemodynamic monitoring in cardiogenic shockPubMedISCCM Guidelines for Hemodynamic Monitoring in the Critically Ill

Bedside imaging

Use echocardiography to define the shock mechanism before escalating therapy

Focused echocardiography is the fastest multiparametric test when the clinical phenotype and resuscitation response diverge.

Use transthoracic echocardiography early to identify the cardiac contribution to shock and to screen for immediately actionable obstruction or mechanical complications. A focused examination can estimate cardiac output, ventricular filling pressures, pulmonary hemodynamics, right-ventricular function, and congestion status while also identifying shock-specific findings such as McConnell sign in pulmonary embolism and mechanical complications of acute coronary syndrome. ScienceDirectUse and Implications of Echocardiography in the Hemodynamic Assessment of Cardiogenic Shock - ScienceDirect

In suspected cardiogenic shock, define whether the limitation is predominantly left ventricular, right ventricular, biventricular, or structural. This distinction matters because an apparently low-output state with right-sided dysfunction may require a different preload and support strategy than left-sided congestion; refractory cardiogenic shock with right-ventricular dysfunction is a specific setting in which pulmonary artery catheterization has been recommended to clarify hemodynamics. PubMedHemodynamic monitoring in cardiogenic shockPubMedISCCM Guidelines for Hemodynamic Monitoring in the Critically Ill

Repeat focused echocardiography after a major change in clinical status or support strategy when it can answer a new question: whether cardiac output has changed, whether congestion has developed, whether right-heart function has deteriorated, or whether an initially occult structural cause is now apparent. Echocardiography is useful for longitudinal monitoring because it links etiology and hemodynamic profile to pharmacologic and mechanical-support decisions. ScienceDirectUse and Implications of Echocardiography in the Hemodynamic Assessment of Cardiogenic Shock - ScienceDirect

Echocardiographic questions that should alter management in shock. ScienceDirectUse and Implications of Echocardiography in the Hemodynamic Assessment of Cardiogenic Shock - ScienceDirectPubMedHemodynamic monitoring in cardiogenic shockPubMedISCCM Guidelines for Hemodynamic Monitoring in the Critically Ill
QuestionEchocardiographic focusManagement consequence
Is cardiac output limited by pump failure?Assess ventricular function and estimate cardiac outputA low-output cardiac phenotype supports escalation beyond empiric fluid and may require invasive characterization if response remains inadequate. Wolters KluwerWhat is cardiogenic shock? New clinical criteria urgently... : Current Opinion in Critical CareScienceDirectUse and Implications of Echocardiography in the Hemodynamic Assessment of Cardiogenic Shock - ScienceDirectPubMedHemodynamic monitoring in cardiogenic shock
Is right-ventricular dysfunction central to the shock state?Assess RV function and pulmonary hemodynamicsConsider pulmonary artery catheterization when RV failure or refractory cardiogenic shock makes filling and output targets uncertain. PubMedHemodynamic monitoring in cardiogenic shockPubMedISCCM Guidelines for Hemodynamic Monitoring in the Critically Ill
Is there obstructive shock?Evaluate for pulmonary embolism-associated right-heart findings, including McConnell signRedirect treatment toward the obstructive cause rather than assuming isolated cardiogenic or hypovolemic shock. ScienceDirectUse and Implications of Echocardiography in the Hemodynamic Assessment of Cardiogenic Shock - ScienceDirect
Is fluid causing pulmonary congestion?Serial lung ultrasound for A-profile versus B-profileB-profile conversion without clinical improvement argues against continued fluid administration in the FALLS protocol. PubMedFALLS-protocol: lung ultrasound in hemodynamic assessment of shock - PMC

Preload assessment

Test fluid responsiveness before giving additional fluid

A rise in cardiac output with transient preload augmentation is more actionable than a static estimate of filling pressure.

Use passive leg raising when the decision is whether an additional fluid bolus will augment cardiac output. The maneuver transiently autotransfuses blood from the lower extremities; interpret it with a contemporaneous measure of stroke volume or cardiac output rather than with blood pressure alone. Dynamic tests based on respiratory variation, passive leg raising, or small-volume fluid challenges are designed to distinguish patients likely to increase cardiac output from those at risk for fluid overload and worsening congestion. NatureHemodynamic Monitoring and Fluid Responsiveness in Critical Care | Intensive Care | Clinical Sciences | Health sciences | Topics | Nature IndexWileyAdvanced Hemodynamic Management in Patients with Septic ShockccjmConsensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task ...

Do not use fluid responsiveness as a mandate to administer fluid. A positive dynamic test indicates preload reserve, not necessarily a need for more intravascular volume; integrate the result with tissue perfusion, pulmonary congestion, right-heart function, and the anticipated effect of fluid on the underlying shock mechanism. NatureHemodynamic Monitoring and Fluid Responsiveness in Critical Care | Intensive Care | Clinical Sciences | Health sciences | Topics | Nature IndexScienceDirectUse and Implications of Echocardiography in the Hemodynamic Assessment of Cardiogenic Shock - ScienceDirect

Use serial lung ultrasound as a safety boundary during fluid assessment. In the FALLS approach, an A-profile with lung sliding after obstructive and left-sided cardiogenic causes have been excluded supports low filling pressure; clinical improvement after fluid supports hypovolemia. Development of a B-profile without clinical improvement supports distributive/septic physiology rather than continued volume replacement. PubMedFALLS-protocol: lung ultrasound in hemodynamic assessment of shock - PMC

Dynamic fluid assessment: what each result should change. NatureHemodynamic Monitoring and Fluid Responsiveness in Critical Care | Intensive Care | Clinical Sciences | Health sciences | Topics | Nature IndexWileyAdvanced Hemodynamic Management in Patients with Septic ShockPubMedFALLS-protocol: lung ultrasound in hemodynamic assessment of shock - PMCccjmEffects of very early start of norepinephrine in patients with septic ...
AssessmentResultNext decision
Passive leg raising with stroke-volume or cardiac-output monitoringCardiac output increases with transient autotransfusionThe patient is preload responsive; decide on fluid only after reviewing perfusion need and congestion risk. NatureHemodynamic Monitoring and Fluid Responsiveness in Critical Care | Intensive Care | Clinical Sciences | Health sciences | Topics | Nature IndexWileyAdvanced Hemodynamic Management in Patients with Septic Shock
Passive leg raising with stroke-volume or cardiac-output monitoringNo meaningful output increaseAvoid assuming additional fluid will improve cardiac output; reassess vasoplegia, pump failure, obstruction, or mixed shock. NatureHemodynamic Monitoring and Fluid Responsiveness in Critical Care | Intensive Care | Clinical Sciences | Health sciences | Topics | Nature IndexccjmConsensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task ...
Lung ultrasound during fluid-limited resuscitationA-profile with lung slidingWithin the FALLS framework, low filling pressure is likely; a monitored fluid response can help separate hypovolemia from distributive physiology. PubMedFALLS-protocol: lung ultrasound in hemodynamic assessment of shock - PMC
Lung ultrasound during fluid administrationB-profile develops without clinical improvementStop further fluid escalation in the FALLS framework and evaluate distributive/septic physiology and alternative hemodynamic support. PubMedFALLS-protocol: lung ultrasound in hemodynamic assessment of shock - PMC

Refractory or mixed shock

Escalate to invasive hemodynamic monitoring when the result will change support

Advanced monitoring is most useful when initial bedside assessment cannot resolve competing fluid, vasopressor, inotrope, or mechanical-support decisions.

Escalate from basic monitoring to pulmonary artery catheterization or transpulmonary thermodilution when shock does not resolve after initial fluid administration and vasopressor therapy, when the etiology is mixed or complex, or when basic arterial and central venous monitoring cannot determine the next intervention. These methods can clarify ongoing fluid requirement, vasopressor need, inotropic support, and cardiopulmonary interactions. PubMedISCCM Guidelines for Hemodynamic Monitoring in the Critically Ill

In cardiogenic shock, use invasive hemodynamics to phenotype severity and guide introduction or optimization of inotropes and vasopressors, timing of mechanical support, and weaning from mechanical circulatory support. Pulmonary artery catheterization is particularly relevant in right-ventricular failure and in cardiogenic shock managed with mechanical circulatory-assist devices. PubMedHemodynamic monitoring in cardiogenic shockPubMedISCCM Guidelines for Hemodynamic Monitoring in the Critically Ill

Select the device according to the unanswered question and local capability. Pulmonary artery catheterization provides pulmonary-artery mixed venous oxygen saturation as an indirect index of tissue oxygenation and is useful for complex cardiopulmonary physiology. Transpulmonary thermodilution is recommended where available for unstable patients with complex cardiopulmonary pathophysiology. PubMedHemodynamic monitoring in cardiogenic shockPubMedISCCM Guidelines for Hemodynamic Monitoring in the Critically Ill

Balance information gain against procedural risk. Reported pulmonary artery catheter complications include insertion-site complications up to 3.6%, heart block in 0.3% to 3.8%, and pulmonary artery rupture in fewer than 1 per 1,000 patients. Use the catheter when its measurements are expected to change management, not solely to obtain more data in a patient whose shock mechanism is already clear and responding to treatment. PubMedHemodynamic monitoring in cardiogenic shock

Selection of advanced hemodynamic monitoring in persistent shock. PubMedHemodynamic monitoring in cardiogenic shockPubMedISCCM Guidelines for Hemodynamic Monitoring in the Critically Ill
Clinical scenarioPreferred escalationReason to escalate
Shock persists after initial fluid and vasopressor therapyPulmonary artery catheterization or transpulmonary thermodilutionDetermines ongoing need for fluid, vasopressor, or inotropic therapy when initial resuscitation has not resolved shock. PubMedISCCM Guidelines for Hemodynamic Monitoring in the Critically Ill
Complex or mixed shockPulmonary artery catheterization or transpulmonary thermodilutionClarifies competing cardiogenic, distributive, and cardiopulmonary contributors. PubMedISCCM Guidelines for Hemodynamic Monitoring in the Critically Ill
Refractory cardiogenic shock with RV dysfunctionPulmonary artery catheterizationProvides advanced characterization when right-heart failure makes bedside estimates insufficient. PubMedHemodynamic monitoring in cardiogenic shockPubMedISCCM Guidelines for Hemodynamic Monitoring in the Critically Ill
Cardiogenic shock receiving mechanical circulatory-assist supportPulmonary artery catheterizationGuides support timing, inotrope management, and weaning decisions. PubMedHemodynamic monitoring in cardiogenic shockPubMedISCCM Guidelines for Hemodynamic Monitoring in the Critically Ill

When mixed shock is likely

Suspect mixed shock when cardiogenic features coexist with distributive physiology or when hypotension, lactate elevation, and organ injury persist despite treatment directed at an apparent primary cardiac cause. Mixed shock complicating cardiogenic shock requires hemodynamic reassessment because low output, altered filling pressures, and systemic vasodilation may coexist and make a single-modality intervention misleading. AHA JournalsMixed Shock Complicating Cardiogenic Shock

Serial reassessment

Use response trajectories to revise the hemodynamic diagnosis

The value of monitoring lies in changing the next intervention as physiology evolves.

Reassess after every meaningful intervention using a consistent set of targets: arterial pressure, cardiac output when measured, lactate trajectory, clinical perfusion, end-organ function, and evidence of congestion. A pressure response alone can be misleading because perfusion failure may persist despite correction of hypotension, particularly when low output or mixed shock remains unresolved. AHA JournalsMixed Shock Complicating Cardiogenic ShockWolters KluwerWhat is cardiogenic shock? New clinical criteria urgently... : Current Opinion in Critical CareWolters KluwerShock: Pathophysiology, Classification, and the... : Cardiology in ReviewPubMedHemodynamic monitoring in cardiogenic shock

Use discordance as an escalation trigger. For example, persistent hyperlactatemia despite improved arterial pressure should prompt reassessment of cardiac output, obstruction, occult mixed shock, hepatic clearance, and adrenergic contribution to lactate elevation rather than automatic fluid administration. Wolters KluwerShock: Pathophysiology, Classification, and the... : Cardiology in ReviewPubMedHemodynamic monitoring in cardiogenic shockPubMedISCCM Guidelines for Hemodynamic Monitoring in the Critically Ill

In cardiogenic shock, do not regard temporary maintenance of blood pressure with escalating vasopressors or inotropes as successful resuscitation if end-organ perfusion does not recover. The treatment objective is restoration of end-organ perfusion without worsening myocardial oxygen demand and ischemia; failure to recover after etiologic treatment and increasing vasoactive requirements should prompt reassessment for mechanical support and advanced hemodynamic characterization. PubMedHemodynamic monitoring in cardiogenic shockPubMedPulmonary Artery Catheter Monitoring in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock: Time for a Reappraisal?

Response patterns that should trigger a change in assessment. AHA JournalsMixed Shock Complicating Cardiogenic ShockWolters KluwerShock: Pathophysiology, Classification, and the... : Cardiology in ReviewScienceDirectUse and Implications of Echocardiography in the Hemodynamic Assessment of Cardiogenic Shock - ScienceDirectPubMedHemodynamic monitoring in cardiogenic shockPubMedISCCM Guidelines for Hemodynamic Monitoring in the Critically IllPubMedPulmonary Artery Catheter Monitoring in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock: Time for a Reappraisal?
Observed trajectoryInterpretationNext step
Blood pressure improves but lactate, hypoperfusion, or organ injury persistsHemodynamic adequacy remains uncertain; lactate may also have nonhypoxic contributorsReassess output, ventricular function, congestion, obstruction, and mixed shock; consider advanced monitoring if uncertainty persists. AHA JournalsMixed Shock Complicating Cardiogenic ShockWolters KluwerShock: Pathophysiology, Classification, and the... : Cardiology in ReviewScienceDirectUse and Implications of Echocardiography in the Hemodynamic Assessment of Cardiogenic Shock - ScienceDirectPubMedISCCM Guidelines for Hemodynamic Monitoring in the Critically Ill
Fluid administration produces lung B-profile without clinical improvementFurther volume is unlikely to provide net benefit in the FALLS frameworkStop fluid escalation and reassess for distributive physiology or alternate support. PubMedFALLS-protocol: lung ultrasound in hemodynamic assessment of shock - PMC
Cardiogenic shock requires increasing vasoactive or inotropic support after etiologic therapyPersistent pump failure may be inadequately characterized or require mechanical supportObtain or intensify invasive hemodynamic assessment and evaluate timing of mechanical support. PubMedHemodynamic monitoring in cardiogenic shockPubMedPulmonary Artery Catheter Monitoring in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock: Time for a Reappraisal?
Clinical and noninvasive assessments disagreeA single bedside estimate is insufficient for treatment selectionUse invasive hemodynamic measurements when the results will determine the next therapy. AHA Journals2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With ...PubMedISCCM Guidelines for Hemodynamic Monitoring in the Critically Ill

References

  1. Contemporary Management of Cardiogenic Shock: A RAND ...www.ahajournals.org · www.ahajournals.org
  2. Mixed Shock Complicating Cardiogenic Shockwww.ahajournals.org · www.ahajournals.org
  3. Contemporary Management of Cardiogenic Shock: A Scientific ...www.ahajournals.org · www.ahajournals.org
  4. 2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With ...www.ahajournals.org · www.ahajournals.org
  5. Hemodynamic Monitoring and Fluid Responsiveness in Critical Care | Intensive Care | Clinical Sciences | Health sciences | Topics | Nature Indexwww.nature.com · www.nature.com
  6. What is cardiogenic shock? New clinical criteria urgently... : Current Opinion in Critical Carejournals.lww.com · journals.lww.com
  7. Evaluation and Initial Stabilization of Undifferentiated Shock - ScienceDirectwww.sciencedirect.com · www.sciencedirect.com
  8. Cardiogenic and Hypovolemic Shock - ScienceDirectwww.sciencedirect.com · www.sciencedirect.com
  9. Identifying cardiogenic shock in the emergency department - ScienceDirectwww.sciencedirect.com · www.sciencedirect.com
  10. Shock: Pathophysiology, Classification, and the... : Cardiology in Reviewjournals.lww.com · journals.lww.com
  11. Criteria for the diagnosis of cardiogenic shock—European perspectiveacademic.oup.com · academic.oup.com
  12. Advanced Hemodynamic Management in Patients with Septic Shockonlinelibrary.wiley.com · onlinelibrary.wiley.com
  13. Use and Implications of Echocardiography in the Hemodynamic Assessment of Cardiogenic Shock - ScienceDirectwww.sciencedirect.com · www.sciencedirect.com
  14. FALLS-protocol: lung ultrasound in hemodynamic assessment of shock - PMCwww.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  15. Shock - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelfwww.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  16. Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task ...www.ccjm.org · www.ccjm.org
  17. Hemodynamic Insights From Simultaneous Common Carotid and ...journal.chestnet.org · journal.chestnet.org
  18. Effects of very early start of norepinephrine in patients with septic ...www.ccjm.org · www.ccjm.org
  19. Evaluation and management of shock in patients with COVID-19www.ccjm.org · www.ccjm.org
  20. [PDF] Algorithms for IV fluid therapy in adults | NICEwww.nice.org.uk · www.nice.org.uk
  21. Hemodynamic monitoring in cardiogenic shockpmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  22. ISCCM Guidelines for Hemodynamic Monitoring in the Critically Illpmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  23. Methods of Monitoring Shock - PMCpmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  24. Pulmonary Artery Catheter Monitoring in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock: Time for a Reappraisal?pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov