Astra logo
Updated October 2025
ED + Inpatient

Approach to Syncope: Bedside Diagnosis and Risk Stratification

A focused bedside pathway for syncope prioritizes early identification of cardiac and other high-risk causes using history, exam, orthostatics, and 12‑lead ECG, followed by targeted testing. Use validated short-term risk tools to support—but not replace—clinical judgment, and reserve admission or expedited workup for high-risk features.

Clinical question
How should clinicians rapidly evaluate syncope at the bedside and stratify short-term risk to guide disposition and testing?
SyncopeEmergency MedicineCardiologyRisk StratificationGuidelines
Key points
Start with the basics
A detailed history, focused exam (including orthostatics), and a 12‑lead ECG make or break the diagnosis; most other tests are discretionary [4], [8], [10].
Rapidly flag high risk
Look for structural heart disease, abnormal ECG, exertional or supine syncope, dyspnea, hypotension, anemia, and family history of sudden death—these warrant admission or expedited workup [6], [7], [8].
Use risk tools wisely
Validated ED scores can assist short-term risk estimation, but must complement clinical judgment and guideline-directed assessment [2], [3], [8], [14].
Target testing to the likely cause
Reflex/orthostatic patterns need orthostatics and triggers; suspected cardiac syncope needs continuous monitoring, troponin as clinically indicated, echocardiography, and possibly ambulatory monitoring [4], [8], [10].
Avoid low-yield routine tests
Neuroimaging, carotid ultrasound, and extensive labs rarely change management without focal deficits or specific indications [8], [10].
Evidence highlights
≈10% among ED syncope presentations [8]
Serious condition within 30 days
History, exam, ECG identify most diagnoses; further tests are selective [4], [8], [10]
Yield of history/ECG
Abnormal ECG, CHF/structural heart disease, age ≥60, exertional syncope, dyspnea, anemia [6], [7], [8]
Key high-risk markers
Bedside Flow
Stepwise Bedside Diagnostic Approach
Identify life-threatening causes, assign short-term risk, and align testing with pretest probability.
1
Immediate safety and rapid triage
Check vitals, glucose, oxygenation, and establish IV access if unstable. Initiate continuous cardiac monitoring for any concerning features (e.g., palpitations before syncope, exertional/supine syncope, known heart disease) [8], [10].
2
Focused history
Characterize prodrome (nausea, warmth), triggers (standing, micturition, pain), context (exertion, supine), and recovery. Elicit cardiac history (CHF, CAD, valvular disease), medications (diuretics, vasodilators, QT‑prolonging agents), and family history of sudden cardiac death. History is the highest-yield diagnostic tool [4], [15].
3
Physical examination with orthostatics
Assess murmurs (aortic stenosis, HCM), signs of heart failure, volume status, and perform orthostatic BP/HR. Orthostatic hypotension or reflex syncope often have clear bedside signatures [4], [8], [10].
4
12‑lead ECG for all
Identify conduction disease (AV block), ischemia, pre-excitation, Brugada pattern, QT prolongation, epsilon waves, or arrhythmias. An abnormal ECG is a strong predictor of adverse outcomes and cardiac syncope [7], [8], [10].
5
Assign short‑term risk
Combine clinical red flags with a validated ED score when helpful. High-risk features drive admission/monitoring; low-risk uncomplicated reflex/orthostatic cases can often be discharged with follow-up [2], [6], [7], [8], [14].
6
Targeted testing
Reserve labs (Hgb, electrolytes, troponin) for clinical indication (e.g., dyspnea, GI bleed, ACS concern). Use echocardiography when structural heart disease is suspected. Consider ambulatory rhythm monitoring for unexplained episodes with concerning features [4], [8], [10].
At-a-Glance
High-Risk Features, Disposition, and Diagnostic Tools
Use this grid to align risk with actions.
High-Risk Red Flags (Admit/Monitor)
Abnormal ECG (ischemia, high-grade AV block, ventricular arrhythmia, QTc prolongation, Brugada pattern) [7], [8]
Known structural heart disease or CHF; prior ventricular arrhythmias [7], [8], [10]
Syncope during exertion or while supine; minimal prodrome [6], [8]
Severe hypotension, persistent bradycardia, or recurrent events in 24–48h [8], [10]
Dyspnea, chest pain, new murmur; concern for PE, ACS, aortic stenosis, HCM [6], [8]
Anemia (Hct <30%), active bleeding, or significant volume depletion [6]
Age ≥60, cerebrovascular disease, hypertension; family history of sudden death <50y [6], [8]
Low-Risk Features (Often Safe Discharge)
Typical reflex (vasovagal) syncope: triggers (pain, emotion, prolonged standing), prodrome (nausea, warmth), rapid recovery, normal ECG [4], [8], [10]
Orthostatic hypotension with clear cause (dehydration, medications, autonomic failure), improves with fluids/med changes [4], [8]
No heart disease, normal vitals/ECG, normal exam, reliable follow-up [8], [10]
Validated ED Risk Scores (Use as Adjuncts)
Tools synthesize clinical variables to predict 7–30 day serious outcomes; performance varies by population and age [2], [3], [14].
Older adults may need conservative thresholds; multi-tool combinations and bedside ultrasound are being explored but need more evidence [9], [14].
Always integrate with guideline-directed evaluation and clinician gestalt [8].
Targeted Diagnostic Tests
ECG for all; continuous monitoring if high-risk or unexplained [8], [10]
Echocardiography if murmur/structural disease suspected or abnormal ECG [4], [8]
Ambulatory rhythm monitoring (patch/loop recorder) for unexplained recurrent episodes or concerning symptoms [8], [10]
Tilt-table testing for suspected reflex syncope when diagnosis remains uncertain and results would change management [8]
Labs (Hgb, electrolytes, creatinine, troponin) only when clinically indicated; avoid routine panels [8], [10]
Avoid routine neuroimaging or carotid ultrasound without focal deficits or alternate neurologic concern [8], [10]
Key Short-Term Outcomes to Prevent
Death, life-threatening arrhythmia, myocardial infarction, PE, major hemorrhage, procedural intervention, or recurrent syncope with injury within 7–30 days [2], [8].
Modifiable Contributors
Medication review: diuretics, vasodilators, negative chronotropes, QT‑prolonging agents [4], [8]
Volume depletion, anemia, electrolyte disturbances [6], [8]
Counsel on hydration, salt (if appropriate), physical counterpressure maneuvers for reflex syncope [8]
Evidence Signals
What Drives Risk? What Adds Yield?
Synthesize data points into actionable bedside heuristics.
Predictors of Adverse Outcomes
Abnormal ECG and history of CHF/structural heart disease strongly predict serious events; classic predictors include age ≥45, CHF, ventricular arrhythmias, and abnormal ECG—each independently increases risk [7].
Composite minor risk markers include age >60, dyspnea, anemia (Hct <0.30), hypertension, cerebrovascular disease, and family history of sudden death—each informs disposition and monitoring level [6].
Population data show syncope carries trauma risk; reflex syncope in youth may cluster in families, while older age and cardiometabolic comorbidity increase risk burden [1], [5], [8].
Diagnostic Yield Principles
History, exam, and ECG drive the majority of diagnoses; routine broad testing is low yield and may distract from targeted evaluation [4], [8], [10].
Echocardiography and ambulatory monitoring have higher yield when pretest probability of cardiac syncope is elevated (abnormal ECG, structural disease, exertional syncope) [4], [8].
In older adults, applying multiple risk tools or adding point-of-care ultrasound may help, but evidence remains limited and heterogeneous [9], [14].
References
Source material
Primary literature that informs this article.
jamanetwork.com

Risk Factors for Syncope Associated With ...

jamanetwork.com

jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2777893
www.sciencedirect.com

Syncope risk stratification in the ED

www.sciencedirect.com

www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1566070214000587
www.sciencedirect.com

Stepwise evaluation of syncope: A prospective population ...

www.sciencedirect.com

www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167527307010352
www.sciencedirect.com

Selecting Appropriate Diagnostic Tools for Evaluating the ...

www.sciencedirect.com

www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0033062012002101
www.nature.com

The relationship between demographic factors and ...

www.nature.com

www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-49722-w
www.ahajournals.org

Syncope | Circulation

www.ahajournals.org

www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circulationaha.112.138396
www.ahajournals.org

Current Evaluation and Management of Syncope

www.ahajournals.org

www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/01.cir.0000031168.96232.ba
www.ahajournals.org

2017 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Evaluation and ...

www.ahajournals.org

www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/cir.0000000000000498
www.sciencedirect.com

Assessing the Predictive Value of Combining Risk Scoring ...

www.sciencedirect.com

www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0736467924000775
www.ahajournals.org

AHA/ACCF Scientific Statement on the Evaluation of Syncope

www.ahajournals.org

www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circulationaha.105.170274
www.sciencedirect.com

AHA/ACCF Scientific Statement on the Evaluation ...

www.sciencedirect.com

www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735109705030445
www.sciencedirect.com

Evaluation of the Patient with Syncope

www.sciencedirect.com

www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0733865118306489
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Evidence-Based Clinical Decision Support Tool

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8663445/
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Application of five risk stratification tools for syncope in ...

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10775749/
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Syncope: a clinically guided diagnostic algorithm

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15480936/