Astra logo
Updated October 2025
Pediatric Acute Care

Approach to Fever Without an Identifiable Source (FWS) in Children

Most children with FWS have self-limited viral infections, but a small subset—particularly young infants—harbor serious bacterial infections (SBI). A structured approach prioritizes immediate stabilization, age- and risk-based testing for UTI/bacteremia/meningitis, judicious use of biomarkers, and clear safety-netting.

Clinical question
How should clinicians evaluate and manage a child with fever without an identifiable source in the first 7 days of illness?
PediatricsEmergency MedicineInfectious DiseasesPrimary Care
Key points
Define FWS and stratify by age
FWS is acute fever <7 days with no focus after exam. Risk and testing intensity vary markedly by age groups: ≤28 days, 29–60 days, 2–24 months, and >24 months [3], [5], [6].
Identify red flags immediately
Toxic appearance, hemodynamic instability, petechiae/purpura, bulging fontanelle, meningeal signs, focal neurologic deficits, respiratory distress mandate urgent sepsis pathway and empiric antibiotics [3], [5].
Use targeted testing
Prioritize urinalysis/urine culture for 2–24 months, consider blood tests and cultures based on age/appearance. Lumbar puncture in neonates and when meningitis suspected; not routine in older well-appearing infants [3], [6].
Leverage biomarkers judiciously
CRP and procalcitonin can refine SBI risk stratification when available, but do not replace clinical assessment; serial exams remain pivotal [3].
Safety-net and follow-up
Provide explicit return precautions, reliable follow-up within 24–48 hours if discharging well-appearing children without antibiotics [3], [5].
Evidence highlights
≥38.0°C (100.4°F) by reliable measurement [2]
Fever definition
Neonates ≤28 days—full sepsis workup recommended [6]
Highest SBI risk
Predominantly viral; UTI is most common SBI in 2–24 months [3]
Common etiologies
Clinical Workflow
Stepwise Evaluation and Management
Ages and appearance drive test selection and disposition. The majority can be safely managed as outpatients with clear safety-netting.
1
1) Confirm fever and assess severity
Verify temperature ≥38.0°C (method and timing). Immediately assess ABCs and perfusion. Look for toxicity or sepsis indicators: altered mental status, poor perfusion, hypotension, cyanosis, petechiae/purpura, focal neurologic deficits [2], [5].
2
2) Focused history and exam
Onset, peak temp, antipyretic response, immunization status, urinary symptoms, GI/respiratory complaints, exposure history. Full exam including ENT, lungs, abdomen, skin, fontanelle, joints, genitourinary; attempt to localize a source while recognizing that most FWS remains viral [1], [3].
3
3) Age-stratified testing
Neonates ≤28 days: full sepsis evaluation (blood, urine, CSF cultures; CBC, CRP/Procalcitonin if available; chest radiograph if respiratory signs) and empiric IV antibiotics with admission [6]. Infants 29–60 days: if well-appearing and low-risk by exam and biomarkers, limited evaluation may allow outpatient management; otherwise broaden testing. Children 2–24 months: prioritize UTI testing; consider bloodwork/cultures if unimmunized, toxic, or biomarker-elevated. >24 months: testing guided by exam and risk; routine chest radiography not indicated without respiratory findings [3], [6].
4
4) Urine testing is high-yield
UTI is the most common SBI in 2–24 months; obtain clean-catch or catheterized urinalysis and culture in at-risk children (especially females <24 months and uncircumcised males) [3].
5
5) Biomarkers to refine risk
CRP and procalcitonin improve SBI risk stratification; elevated values increase likelihood of bacteremia/meningitis, while low values support observation in well-appearing infants. Interpret in context; they do not obviate urine culture in 2–24 months [3].
6
6) Imaging
Chest radiograph only with respiratory signs or persistent high fever with tachypnea; not routine in older infants if exam is normal. Abdominal imaging reserved for focal signs (appendicitis) [6].
7
7) Antimicrobial strategy
Empiric IV antibiotics for neonates and any toxic-appearing child. For well-appearing older infants and children, avoid empiric antibiotics unless a bacterial focus is identified (e.g., positive UA) or risk is high. Treat confirmed UTI per local resistance patterns [3], [6].
8
8) Disposition and follow-up
Admit neonates and any child with instability or concern for SBI. Well-appearing children with reassuring evaluation may be discharged with clear return precautions and 24–48 hour follow-up; ensure caregivers understand triggers for return (persistent fever, new focal signs, poor intake, lethargy) [3], [5].
At-a-Glance
Risk Stratification and Orders
Use these quick checks to standardize care and reduce missed SBIs.
Red Flags (Act Now)
Toxic appearance, hypotension, poor perfusion
Petechiae/purpura, bulging fontanelle, neck stiffness
Focal neurologic deficits, altered mental status
Severe respiratory distress or hypoxia
Age ≤28 days with any fever [6]
Core Tests by Age
≤28 days: Blood cultures, CBC, CRP/PCT (if available), UA and catheterized urine culture, lumbar puncture, consider chest radiograph; admit and start IV antibiotics [6]
29–60 days: At minimum UA and urine culture; consider CBC, CRP/PCT, blood culture; LP if ill-appearing or biomarkers markedly abnormal [3], [6]
2–24 months: UA and urine culture strongly considered; targeted bloodwork/cultures if unimmunized/toxic; no routine CXR without respiratory signs [3]
>24 months: Testing driven by exam and risk; UA if urinary symptoms or risk factors [3]
When to Consider LP in >28 Days
Ill-appearing or neurologic signs
Strongly elevated inflammatory markers with no source
Persistent high fever with irritability/lethargy
Antibiotics before cultures planned
Immunocompromised host [3], [6]
Antibiotic Triggers
Neonates ≤28 days: empiric IV (e.g., ampicillin + gentamicin/cefotaxime) after cultures [6]
Ill-appearing any age: empiric IV broad-spectrum after cultures [5]
Positive UA with pyuria/nitrites: start UTI therapy pending culture [3]
Radiographic pneumonia or bacterial focus: treat per guidelines [3]
Safe Discharge Criteria
Well-appearing, hemodynamically stable, tolerating fluids
Reliable caregivers and access to follow-up within 24–48 hours
Reassuring evaluation (e.g., negative UA, low-risk biomarkers where used)
Explicit return precautions provided and understood [3], [5]
Pearls
UTI is the most common SBI in 2–24 months—do not skip urine testing [3]
Biomarkers help, but serial exams remain essential [3]
Routine CXR and LP are not indicated in well-appearing older infants without signs [6]
Vaccination status modifies bacteremia risk (Hib, pneumococcal) [3], [5]
References
Source material
Primary literature that informs this article.
bestpractice.bmj.com

Assessment of fever in children - Differential diagnosis ...

bestpractice.bmj.com

bestpractice.bmj.com/topics/en-gb/692
bestpractice.bmj.com

Evaluation of fever in children

bestpractice.bmj.com

bestpractice.bmj.com/topics/en-us/692
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Fever without a source in children

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9928815/
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Fever without source in infants and young children

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8961849/
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Fever - PMC

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7173579/
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Evaluation of fever in infants and young children

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23418797/